Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal or religious advice. Readers should seek tailored advice from a qualified New South Wales lawyer and their religious adviser.
Introduction
Creating an Islamic will is a vital part of honouring religious duties for Muslims in New South Wales. These estate plans, however, must operate within the framework of state law, which can lead to potential legal challenges. A Sharia-compliant will may face a family provision claim under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) if an eligible person believes they have not been adequately provided for, creating a complex legal and religious matter that can lead to a will dispute.
This guide provides essential information for testators and executors on the intersection of Islamic inheritance principles and NSW succession law. Understanding how to prepare a will that respects religious obligations while also being defensible against a family provision claim is crucial for ensuring that testamentary wishes are upheld and the integrity of the estate plan is protected.
Interactive Tool: Check Your Risk of a Claim Against Your Islamic Will
Islamic Will Family Provision Risk Checker
Quickly assess your risk of a family provision claim against your Sharia-compliant will in NSW.
Are you the executor or beneficiary of a will that distributes assets according to Islamic (Sharia) principles?
Has an eligible person (e.g., spouse, child, dependent) indicated they may challenge the will for inadequate provision?
Does the will provide unequal shares to male and female heirs (e.g., sons receive more than daughters)?
Has the testator included a written Statement of Wishes explaining the reasons for the distribution?
⚠️ High Risk of Family Provision Claim
- Section 60 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
- Omari v Omari [2012] ACTSC 33
⚖️ Moderate Risk: Defensible with Evidence
- Section 60 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
- Omari v Omari [2012] ACTSC 33
✅ Low Risk: Well-Documented and Compliant
- Section 60 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
❌ Not Applicable: Standard NSW Will
- Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
This tool provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Results are indicative only and based on the information you provide. For advice specific to your circumstances, Contact LawBridge’s Wills and Estate Lawyers.
Request a Consultation with one of our experienced Lawyers today.
Get Your Initial Consultation
What Is a Family Provision Claim in NSW
Defining a Family Provision Claim
A family provision claim is a legal application made to the Supreme Court of New South Wales by an eligible person who believes a deceased person’s will has not provided for them adequately. Under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), this type of claim allows the court to intervene and adjust the distribution of the estate.
To succeed in making a family provision claim, the applicant must demonstrate that the will fails to make sufficient provision for their:
- Proper maintenance.
- Ongoing education.
- General advancement in life.
Ultimately, the court assesses this based on the specific circumstances of the case, rather than simply what might be considered fair.
Identifying Who Is an Eligible Person to Make a Claim
The Succession Act 2006 (NSW) strictly defines who is considered an ‘eligible person’ to make a family provision claim. Consequently, it is not open to just anyone to contest a will.
The categories of eligible persons include:
- The wife or husband of the deceased person at the time of their death.
- A de facto partner, including a same-sex partner, who was living with the deceased when they died.
- A child of the deceased, which also includes any adopted children.
- A former wife or husband of the deceased.
- A person who was dependent on the deceased, who is either a grandchild or was a member of the deceased’s household at any time. This requires showing that the person was wholly or partly dependent on the deceased.
- A person in a close personal relationship with the deceased at the time of their death.
100% Obligation-Free
Speak to one of our Experienced Lawyers Today
Understanding Islamic Wills & NSW Succession Law
The Principles of a Sharia-Compliant Will
An Islamic will, often referred to as a Wasiyyah, follows specific principles outlined in Sharia law that govern the distribution of a person’s estate. A key feature of this estate plan, a core principle in wills and estate planning, is the restriction on testamentary freedom, which differs significantly from the broad discretion allowed under New South Wales law.
Under Islamic principles, a Muslim’s estate is typically divided into two parts:
- Two-thirds of the estate must be distributed among prescribed legal heirs according to fixed shares detailed in the Qur’an.
- The remaining one-third is at the testator’s discretion.
This discretionary portion can be bequeathed to individuals or charities who are not already designated as legal heirs. Consequently, this allows the will-maker to support other causes or relatives.
The Religious Rationale for Unequal Shares
A common feature of Islamic wills is that male heirs sometimes receive a share twice that of their female counterparts. According to many Islamic scholars, this distribution is not arbitrary but is based on the different financial responsibilities placed upon men and women under Sharia law.
Men have a religious and legal obligation, known as Nafaqah, to financially support their female relatives, including their wives, sisters, and mothers. Therefore, the larger inheritance share is intended to provide them with the means to fulfil these duties.
In contrast, women are granted financial independence and are not obligated to spend their wealth on others. This means any inheritance they receive is theirs to keep without the same financial responsibilities.
Can Family Provision Claims Be Made Against Islamic Wills
Under New South Wales law, a family provision claim can be made against any valid will, including one that is Sharia-compliant.
The Succession Act 2006 (NSW) provides specific avenues for these challenges:
- Eligible persons, such as a spouse or child, can challenge a will if they believe they have not been left with adequate provision for their proper maintenance and advancement in life.
- The NSW Supreme Court has the authority to alter the terms of any will to make such provision.
From an Islamic perspective, seeking a legal remedy to ensure financial rights are met may also be permissible.
Some Islamic legal rulings suggest that if a beneficiary’s right to financial provision is not fulfilled as required by Islamic principles, it is acceptable for them to seek a remedy through a secular court system.
Ultimately, this allows a person to make a family provision claim in NSW to restore the financial support they believe they are entitled to.
Request a Consultation with one of our experienced Lawyers today.
Get Your Initial Consultation
Key Factors the Court Considers in a Family Provision Claim
An Overview of Section 60 of the Succession Act
When the Supreme Court of New South Wales assesses a family provision claim, it follows the criteria in Section 60 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). The court is not limited to one or two issues; instead, it looks at every relevant circumstance to ensure a thorough evaluation before altering a will.
The court’s key considerations include:
- Relationship with the deceased: It examines the nature and duration of their connection.
- Obligations and responsibilities: Any financial or moral duties the deceased owed to the claimant or other beneficiaries are weighed.
- The estate’s value: The size and nature of the estate dictate what can realistically be distributed.
- Claimant’s financial situation: The court reviews the claimant’s current and future needs, along with external financial support.
- Beneficiaries’ financial circumstances: It considers each beneficiary’s financial position.
- Disabilities: Any physical, intellectual, or mental disabilities affecting the claimant or beneficiaries are relevant.
- Contributions to the estate: The court recognises contributions to the estate or to the deceased’s welfare made by the claimant.
- Deceased’s testamentary intentions: Evidence of the deceased’s testamentary intentions—such as written statements or notes—is also taken into account.
The Claimant’s Financial Needs vs the Beneficiaries’ Circumstances
A central task for the court is balancing the competing needs of the claimant and the named beneficiaries. It must weigh the claimant’s asserted financial needs against the circumstances of those the deceased chose to benefit.
Because of this balance, beneficiaries defending the will should provide evidence of their own financial position to establish a competing claim on the estate.
If beneficiaries fail to do so, the court may:
- infer they are financially secure and do not intend to advance a competing claim;
- more readily accept the claimant’s prioritised need for provision.
100% Obligation-Free
Speak to one of our Experienced Lawyers Today
How to Defend Your Estate Plan Against a Claim
The Executor’s Duty to Uphold the Will
When a family provision claim is made against a will in New South Wales, the executor has a primary duty to uphold the provisions of the deceased’s estate plan, a key reason why appointing an executor for your Islamic will is such a critical decision. The executor must act in the best interests of the estate, which involves defending the will against the legal challenge.
While defending the will, the executor is also required to act reasonably and remain neutral in any disputes between beneficiaries. This duty involves taking specific steps, such as:
- Considering negotiation or mediation to resolve the claim amicably, which can be particularly important in smaller estates where avoiding excessive legal costs is a priority.
- Putting all relevant evidence before the court to ensure the deceased’s testamentary wishes are properly considered.
Justifying Unequal Shares in Your Affidavits
In defending an Islamic will, affidavits provide a crucial opportunity to explain the religious and moral reasoning behind distributions that may appear unequal. According to many Islamic scholars, the practice of a male heir receiving a larger share is not arbitrary but is based on the financial responsibilities placed upon men.
This obligation, known as Nafaqah, requires men to financially support their female relatives, including wives, sisters, and mothers. An affidavit can present evidence to clarify these roles by highlighting that:
- The will’s structure is designed to equip male beneficiaries to fulfil these financial duties.
- Women are granted financial independence under Sharia law and are not required to spend their inheritance on others, which provides context for the distribution in the estate plan.
Using a Statement of Wishes to Support Your Will
A testator can significantly strengthen their estate plan by preparing a written Statement of Wishes to accompany their will. This document serves several important purposes:
- It explains the reasons for the specific distributions, providing direct evidence of the testator’s intentions and thinking.
- It acts as a powerful tool for the executor in defending the will, even though it cannot completely prevent a family provision claim.
The New South Wales Supreme Court is permitted to consider any evidence of the deceased’s testamentary intentions, including written statements.
In previous cases, the court has given considerable weight to a clear and detailed statement that explains the rationale behind the will-maker’s decisions. This helps demonstrate that the distributions were made thoughtfully and for reasons the testator considered just and reasonable.
Request a Consultation with one of our experienced Lawyers today.
Get Your Initial Consultation
A Brief Overview of the Omari v Omari Case
The Facts of the Case & Its Relevance
The case of Mohamed Omari and Mustapha Omari v Fatma Omari [2012] ACTSC 33 is a notable Australian legal matter that brought significant attention to the use of Sharia-compliant wills within the secular legal system. In this case, a daughter contested her mother’s will, which had been drafted to distribute the estate “in accordance with the Islamic faith.”
The challenge arose due to the following factors:
- The will allocated the daughter a share of the estate that was half the size of the shares left to her brothers.
- The daughter made a claim on the basis that she had not been adequately provided for.
This situation created a direct conflict between traditional Islamic inheritance principles and Australian succession law.
The Court’s Ruling & Its Limited Precedent
Although the case centred on a dispute over unequal shares in an Islamic will, the court’s final decision did not rule on the validity of the Sharia-based distribution. Instead, the will was declared invalid because the court found that the testator lacked the mental capacity required to make a valid will at the time she signed it, due to advanced dementia.
This distinction is critical, as the ruling was based on the issue of testamentary capacity, not on the religious principles guiding the will’s content. Consequently, the outcome of the Omari v Omari case resulted in the following:
- It did not set a legal precedent in Australia against the validity of Islamic wills that provide for unequal shares.
- Because the will was invalid, the estate was distributed equally among the children according to the rules of intestacy.
100% Obligation-Free
Speak to one of our Experienced Lawyers Today
Conclusion
Drafting a Sharia-compliant will in New South Wales requires balancing religious duties with the legal framework of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) to withstand a potential family provision claim. A properly prepared estate plan, supported by clear documentation such as a Statement of Wishes, is essential for an executor to defend the testator’s intentions and justify the distributions made.
If you need assistance with your estate plan or are facing a dispute over an Islamic will, it is crucial to seek specialised legal advice. Contact our experienced Islamic wills and estate lawyers at LawBridge today to ensure your testamentary wishes are protected and your religious obligations are respected within New South Wales law.
Frequently Asked Questions
An ‘eligible person’ as defined by the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) can make a family provision claim. This includes a spouse, de facto partner, child, former spouse, and certain dependants who were part of the deceased’s household.
Yes, a family provision claim must be filed with the court within 12 months of the deceased person’s date of death. The court may grant an extension of this time limit only if sufficient cause is shown.
According to many Islamic scholars, this distribution is based on the religious duty placed on men, known as nafaqah, to financially support their female relatives. Women are granted financial independence and are not obligated to spend their inheritance on others.
Yes, the Supreme Court of New South Wales has the authority to alter the terms of any valid will, including a Sharia-compliant one, if an eligible person makes a successful family provision claim. This ensures that adequate provision is made for the claimant’s proper maintenance and advancement in life.
The court determines who pays the legal costs, which are often paid from the estate if the claim is successful and reasonably brought. However, if a claim is unsuccessful or considered frivolous, the claimant may be ordered to pay their own costs as well as the estate’s legal expenses.
No, the court considers a wide range of factors under Section 60 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), not just the claimant’s financial needs. These factors include the nature of the relationship with the deceased, the size of the estate, and the financial circumstances of the other beneficiaries.
In the case of Omari v Omari, the court declared the Islamic will invalid because the testator was found to lack the required mental capacity at the time of signing. The decision was not based on the Sharia-compliant distribution of the estate, and therefore it did not set a legal precedent against unequal shares in Islamic wills.








